#codingexercise
In the previous exercise of 15-puzzle, we talked about finding inversion counts.
int GetInversions( int[,] board, int N)
{
int count = 0;
var serialized = board.ToList();
for (int i =0; i < N*N-1; i++)
for (int j = i+1; j < N *N; j++)
if (serialized[i] && serialized[j] && serialized [i] > serialized[j])
count++;
return count;
}
int findXPosition(int[,] board, int N)
{
for (int i = N-1; i >= 0; i--)
for (int j = N-1; j >= 0; j--)
if (board[i , j] == 0)
return N-i;
Return -1;
}
We were talking about docker usage of clusters. Asimple way to take advantage of the cluster is to have a file system that stretches over the cluster. Notably OneFS is an example of such a file system that can expand to a large number of nodes for a very large storage. Using a cluster instead of the host, lets the docker to have resources far beyond the capability of a single host. In this model, docker can continue to operate out of a single host but have a file system that spans clusters. This may require little or no change to how docker operates on a single host.
In terms of compute improvements as opposed to storage, there is a possibility that the runtime interfaces docker uses such as libcontainer, libvirt, lxc and systemdnspawn interfaces with Linux, could possibly be replaced by something that targets similar functionalities on a cluster where the replacement of a host by a cluster does not affect the operations of docker.
Moreover, a cluster can improve batch processing via scatter and gather operations as opposed to the serial single processor techniques in compute. This provides an additional leverage for task parallel operations in docker on a cluster.
Given a tree, implement a function which replaces a node’s value with the sum of all its childrens’ value, considering only those children whose value is less than than the main node’s value.
void ToChildrenSumTree(ref node root)
{
int left = 0;
int right = 0;
if (root==null || (root.left == null && root.right == null)) return;
ToChildrenSumTree(ref root.left);
ToChildrenSumTree(ref root.right);
If (root.left != null) left = root.left.data;
If (root.right != null) right = root.right.data;
int sum = 0;
if (left < root.data) sum += left;
if (right < root.data) sum += right;
int delta = sum - root.data;
if (delta >= 0)
root.data = root.data + delta;
else
increment(ref root, 0-delta);
}
In the previous exercise of 15-puzzle, we talked about finding inversion counts.
int GetInversions( int[,] board, int N)
{
int count = 0;
var serialized = board.ToList();
for (int i =0; i < N*N-1; i++)
for (int j = i+1; j < N *N; j++)
if (serialized[i] && serialized[j] && serialized [i] > serialized[j])
count++;
return count;
}
int findXPosition(int[,] board, int N)
{
for (int i = N-1; i >= 0; i--)
for (int j = N-1; j >= 0; j--)
if (board[i , j] == 0)
return N-i;
Return -1;
}
We were talking about docker usage of clusters. Asimple way to take advantage of the cluster is to have a file system that stretches over the cluster. Notably OneFS is an example of such a file system that can expand to a large number of nodes for a very large storage. Using a cluster instead of the host, lets the docker to have resources far beyond the capability of a single host. In this model, docker can continue to operate out of a single host but have a file system that spans clusters. This may require little or no change to how docker operates on a single host.
Another way to take advantage of the cluster is to not be
host bound but cluster bound where an instance of the docker runs on each node
and there is a translation or mapping of the workload on the cluster to target
a specific node in the custer. This calls for a dotted naming convention where
we can scope down progressively to the specific instance. This too may not require changes to the way
docker runs on a single host but in additional capabilities that maintain mapping
information between apps and docker instances.
In terms of compute improvements as opposed to storage, there is a possibility that the runtime interfaces docker uses such as libcontainer, libvirt, lxc and systemdnspawn interfaces with Linux, could possibly be replaced by something that targets similar functionalities on a cluster where the replacement of a host by a cluster does not affect the operations of docker.
Moreover, a cluster can improve batch processing via scatter and gather operations as opposed to the serial single processor techniques in compute. This provides an additional leverage for task parallel operations in docker on a cluster.
Given a tree, implement a function which replaces a node’s value with the sum of all its childrens’ value, considering only those children whose value is less than than the main node’s value.
void ToChildrenSumTree(ref node root)
{
int left = 0;
int right = 0;
if (root==null || (root.left == null && root.right == null)) return;
ToChildrenSumTree(ref root.left);
ToChildrenSumTree(ref root.right);
If (root.left != null) left = root.left.data;
If (root.right != null) right = root.right.data;
int sum = 0;
if (left < root.data) sum += left;
if (right < root.data) sum += right;
int delta = sum - root.data;
if (delta >= 0)
root.data = root.data + delta;
else
increment(ref root, 0-delta);
}
No comments:
Post a Comment