Tenant-To-Tenant Migration architecture model:
Migration comes into play when there are scenarios such as
mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and others where an existing 365 tenant
must be moved to a new tenant. There are dedicated personnel and consulting
services to help with this migration, so it warrants a brief introduction in a
book for multitenant applications.
A specific architecture model called the Tenant-to-Tenant
migration architecture model is one of the popular ones among several architectural
approaches towards this purpose. This model provides guidance and a starting
point for planning with focus on mapping of business scenarios to architecture
along with design considerations.
Let us take the traditional names of Contoso for a source
tenant and Fabrikam for a target tenant.
A tenant-to-tenant migration can be single-event migration,
phased migration, or tenant move or split.
In a single event migration, everything is migrated as a
single event. There is a higher risk and a shorter timeline. Single-event
migrations larger than 15000 users or 7 TB of site content. In this case, data
volumes, network bandwidth, and helpdesk capacity can be limiting factors to
scale. The next approach might be preferable when the single-event approach is
limiting. Identities migrate to a target tenant and will keep the existing
domain as part of the migration. The net benefit to the users is that they keep
their email address as say user@contoso.com
Phased migration is the gradual migration of users, services
and data. Source domains are not transferred. Users assume a new target
domain. There is lower risk and a longer
timeline. The only drawback is the coexistence limitation. Identities will
migrate to a new target tenant and will change the brand identity as part of
the migration. Users will have an email
address as user@fabrikam.com
Tenant move or split is similar to single-event but it does
not include migrating accounts to a new on-premises AD DS forest. This approach
should not be used with long-term coexistence for tenant splits. There is
additional work required to re-establish existing identities to the new tenant.
The identities remain in the source tenant but all the users in the affected
domain and all the workloads are moved to a new tenant.
The activities during migration events may vary but include
the following:
Before the migration, communication is sent to each user and
mailboxes and content are made read-only.
During the migration,
reverse forwarding mail is stopped and new email is allowed to be delivered to
the target tenant. Target accounts are enabled, if required. The final data
migration is completed.
After the migration, users must recreate their mobile
profiles and the client software needs to be reconfigured which includes Outlook
and Microsoft 365 clients.
The decision for the choice between the approaches depends
on the factors such as if the domains in the target environment must be
retained, where the environment to be migrated to is brand new, whether there
is continued collaboration between the environments is expected to be in the
end-state, whether there are on-premises AD domains that need to be
synchronized to Azure, what workloads are being used in the source tenants, how
many accounts are involved, is the mail forwarding required after migration,
and whether there is a unified Global Address List required.
Reference:
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Ashlm-Nw-wnWhLMfc6pdJbQZ6XiPWA?e=fBoKcN
No comments:
Post a Comment