We continue with the essay on comparison of Kubernetes with platform as a service framework. PaaS may be called out as being restrictive to applications, dictating choice of application frameworks, restricting supported language runtimes and distinguishing apps from services. Kubernetes, on the other hand, aims to support an extremely diverse variety of workloads. As long as the application has been compiled to run in a container, it will work with Kubernetes. Kubernetes evolved as an industry effort from the native Linux containers support of the operating system. It can be considered as a step towards a truly container centric development environment. Containers decouple applications from infrastructure which separates dev from ops.
Containers made PaaS possible. Containers help compile the code for isolation. PaaS enables applications and containers to run independently. PaaS containers were not open source. They were just proprietary to PaaS. This changed the model towards development centric container frameworks where applications could now be written with their own containers. Docker and Kubernetes fueled this move towards custom containers.Many people consider PaaS platform to be fixed and Container framework to be flexible. This is actually a shifting boundary between dev ops and developers
Containers made PaaS possible. Containers help compile the code for isolation. PaaS enables applications and containers to run independently. PaaS containers were not open source. They were just proprietary to PaaS. This changed the model towards development centric container frameworks where applications could now be written with their own containers. Docker and Kubernetes fueled this move towards custom containers.Many people consider PaaS platform to be fixed and Container framework to be flexible. This is actually a shifting boundary between dev ops and developers
No comments:
Post a Comment