There are quite a few metrics to evaluate and compare cloud hosting as provided by different vendors such as Amazon, Azure, Rackspace, Uhuru. Some of these are listed here:
1) Setting up the environment. Cloud hosting service providers may offer storage, application hosting, web site hosting and many other features. In order to create a cloud, one may need to specify one or more of these choices for the environment. Amazon and Azure for instance provide various environment options. Some of them are easy to deploy run of the mill web applications while the others are there to serve more customizations such as different forms of storage - table, blobs, database et al.
2) Deployment. Application deployment is a repeated practice and hence the UI for deployment should consider ease of use. Time taken for the deployment or to go live is also an important consideration In this case, its not just the application developer who wants to be able bounce the production server and look at the stats but also the customers who might have to wait when the application is still deploying. Application deployment is probably the single most repeated interaction between a cloud service provider and the application developer.
3) Application deployment options is another big differentiator between the vendors. Some vendors allow for specifying the region where the servers are located. Some also allow configuring the network and the DNS registration of the application. Some allow remote desktop to the server itself. Some others allow for configuring security on the servers and application. Some allow more than one way of uploading the software. For example this could either be from packages or source control based deployment.
4) Another important consideration is the variety of web applications supported by the service provider. For example, some vendors may allow .Net software application hosting, others may allow php, ruby on rails, etc. Deployments for these might also require different servers to be cut as VM slices - different both in terms of operating system as well as the hosting stack.
5) Ease of use for end to end flow. This is probably the single most important factor in making these popular. In that respect, the Uhuru web application hosting experience is a breeze and delight. However, I haven't looked into .Net application deployment there.
1) Setting up the environment. Cloud hosting service providers may offer storage, application hosting, web site hosting and many other features. In order to create a cloud, one may need to specify one or more of these choices for the environment. Amazon and Azure for instance provide various environment options. Some of them are easy to deploy run of the mill web applications while the others are there to serve more customizations such as different forms of storage - table, blobs, database et al.
2) Deployment. Application deployment is a repeated practice and hence the UI for deployment should consider ease of use. Time taken for the deployment or to go live is also an important consideration In this case, its not just the application developer who wants to be able bounce the production server and look at the stats but also the customers who might have to wait when the application is still deploying. Application deployment is probably the single most repeated interaction between a cloud service provider and the application developer.
3) Application deployment options is another big differentiator between the vendors. Some vendors allow for specifying the region where the servers are located. Some also allow configuring the network and the DNS registration of the application. Some allow remote desktop to the server itself. Some others allow for configuring security on the servers and application. Some allow more than one way of uploading the software. For example this could either be from packages or source control based deployment.
4) Another important consideration is the variety of web applications supported by the service provider. For example, some vendors may allow .Net software application hosting, others may allow php, ruby on rails, etc. Deployments for these might also require different servers to be cut as VM slices - different both in terms of operating system as well as the hosting stack.
5) Ease of use for end to end flow. This is probably the single most important factor in making these popular. In that respect, the Uhuru web application hosting experience is a breeze and delight. However, I haven't looked into .Net application deployment there.
No comments:
Post a Comment